منابع مشابه
Lotteries and justification
The lottery paradox shows that the following three individually highly plausible theses are jointly incompatible: (i) highly probable propositions are justifiably believable, (ii) justified believability is closed under conjunction introduction, (iii) known contradictions are not justifiably believable. This paper argues that a satisfactory solution to the lottery paradox must reject (i) as ver...
متن کاملDoing the best one can: a new justification for the use of lotteries
In some cases in which rational and moral agents experience moral uncertainty, they are unable to assign exact degrees of moral value—in a non-arbitrary way—to some of the different acts available to them, and so are unable to choose with certainty the best act. This article presents a new justification for the use of lotteries in this kind of situation. It is argued that sometimes the only rat...
متن کاملLotteries for consumers versus lotteries for firms
Prescott emphasizes similarities between lotteries that smooth nonconvexities for firms and for consumer-workers. We emphasize their differences. We also argue that models with employment lotteries that are used to generate unemployed individuals in a frictionless framework can have very different implications than models embodying frictional unemployment. As an illustration, models with employ...
متن کاملSymmetry and impartial lotteries
A prize is to be randomly assigned to some agent, so each agent designates one of his peers on a ballot. The ballots determine the lottery which selects the winner, and impartiality requires that no agent’s report impacts his own chance of winning. The primary results are (1) a characterization of all impartial rules which treat agents symmetrically as voters and (2) a characterization of all i...
متن کاملBasic and legal analysis of the justification or non-justification of killing in defense of property
Justifying or not justifying killing in defense of property has always been a challenging issue for jurists Western jurists have studied such killing in the light of the principle of proportionalit. . That is,whether there is a balance and proportionality between defensive action - killing aggressor- and aggressive action - attacking property – or not. based on this principle, some believe that...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Synthese
سال: 2015
ISSN: 0039-7857,1573-0964
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-015-0989-5